Skip to main content

Girls Around Me app

Girls Around Me app
Girls Around Me app - 'Girls Around Me' app removed, While it was still available, the smart-phone app 'Girls Around Me' could find women in bars, restaurants and homes, then use data from social networks to show subjects' age, photos, marital status and precise location. That app, however, is no longer available, after concerns over stalking and invasion of privacy got it yanked from digital stores irls Around Me leaves App Store
After Foursquare severed ties on Saturday with the controversial Girls Around Me app, the company that built that application for the iPhone and iPad has “voluntarily” pulled it from Apple's app store. After all, the app essentially had zero value without geo-location data. Foursquare’s action was the right one, but was it really necessary to wait for a wave of criticism to know Girls Around Me was a bad idea?
Russian app maker i-Free Innovations created Girls Around Me as a way for registered users to scan a neighborhood in search of women—and in spite of the apps name, men too. Using Foursquare check-in data paired with personal information and photos culled from Facebook’s public data, users could snoop into the lives of women in their area—all without the women’s knowledge.

A statement released by i-Free Innovations after it pulled the app and published by the Wall Street Journal, said:

Girls Around Me does not provide any data that is unavailable to user when he uses his or her social network account, nor does it reveal any data that users did not share with others. The app was intended for facilitating discovering of great public venues nearby.

If this is the case, perhaps they should have called the app Public Venues Around Me. And instead of the green-neon silhouette of an apparently nude woman for the logo, how about a nice image of the Golden Gate Bridge or the Grand Canyon?

But that didn’t happen. The company gathered a bunch of already available information, packaged it with a sexual subtext, and marketed it to men who wanted to know as much as possible about the women around them.
A Foursquare spokesperson on Saturday said, “The application was in violation of our API policy, so we reached out to the developer and shut off their API access.”

Portfolio.com has reached out to both Apple and Facebook to ask about their role in the creation and distribution of the app and has not at this time received reply.

In its statement to the Journal, i-Free called itself “a scapegoat to talk about the privacy concerns” and said the criticism represented “a serious misunderstanding of the apps’ goals, purpose, abilities, and restrictions.” Although the statement does make for interesting reading, it mostly just passes the responsibility on to others.

In fact, no single party is to blame for the existence of this app—i-Free built it using publicly available information provided by Foursquare and Facebook and sold it on Apple's app store—the involvement of such companies needs to be called what it is—a tacit endorsement. After all, Apple does reject apps for business or content reasons, and it reviews each app that is submitted for inclusion.

Apple—not to mention Foursquare, Facebook, and any other company that collects personal data—might want to pay more attention to what's happening with this highly valuable information. The next time company technology is used to facilitate similar violations of privacy, and potentially the physical safety of people who never even signed up for the service, it might be a good idea to get involved before the public’s safety is threatened.

amid 'stalking' row Controversial mobile app Girls Around Me allowed users to locate women near their location on a map and to see pictures of them.The app used information drawn from publicly available profiles on Facebook and check-ins on location service FourSquare. The women involved were not asked for any consent, and did not know their information, including photos, were being displayed to strangers.

Girls Around Me’s access to location-sharing service Foursquare was withdrawn on Saturday after the company was told it was breaching terms and conditions by aggregating data.
The Russian app developer, i-Free Innovations, consequently withdrew the app from Apple's App Store, and issued a statement to The Wall Street Journal. It claimed it was “unethical to pick a scapegoat to talk about the privacy concerns. We see this wave of negative as a serious misunderstanding of the apps’ goals, purpose, abilities and restrictions.”
The app's website had claimed "Girls Around Me is the perfect complement to any pick-up strategy. And with millions of chicks checking in daily, there’s never been a better time to be on the hunt.”

Although the app has been at the centre of a storm of protest online, led by website Cult of Mac, it only used publicly available data. While a storm of protest surrounded its use to stalk women, many critics also pointed out that the app in fact highlighted how much information people either willingly or unknowingly made public about themselves online.

Popular posts from this blog

Beautiful Ireland Introduction

Beautiful Ireland Introduction Beautiful Ireland Introduction  -  Ireland has always been considered a land of mystical and often magical happenings. It is a country steeped in myths and legends that live in harmony beside the modern world of today. Most travelers describe Ireland as a stunning land with unsurpassed beauty and one which possesses a history that goes back so far only the fairy folk remember its beginnings.

Royal wedding more than 24.5 million UK viewers

Royal wedding more than 24.5 million UK viewers, Prince William and Kate Middleton's Royal Wedding was watched by more than 24 million terrestrial TV viewers in the UK, according to overnight estimates from industry body Barb. The BBC achieved a large share of the UK viewing figures for Friday's (April 29) ceremony, with a peak figure of 20 million tuning in to the corporation's broadcast of the Westminster Abbey service. More than 34 million people caught at least some of the Royal Wedding coverage through the BBC, including on its iPlayer service, reports BBC News. Sky News said it had a peak of 661,000 viewers at the start of the wedding ceremony, while BBC Two, Channel 4 and Five only made up 1 per cent of the audience as the nuptials began. William and Kate's service is now in the all-time top 10 programmes in the UK, but drew less viewers than the 1966 World Cup Final (32.3 million) and Princess Diana's funeral in 1997 (32.1 million).

Guinness World Records Most live streams for a single event

Guinness World Records Most live streams for a single event, The YouTube broadcast of Prince William’s marriage to Catherine Middleton (both UK) in London, UK, on 29 April 2011 achieved a record 72 million live views, as people from 188 countries around the world tuned in to watch the event on the company’s official Royal Channel. Although this figure alone was enough to beat the 70 million streams achieved during the inauguration of US President Barack Obama in 2009, the wedding’s overall tally is likely to have been significantly higher when taking into account the millions watching via other live streaming services.